Description
It is said in the great annals of the internet that a growth factor of 2 is double-plus bad. The reason for that peculiar peculiarity is the following: let it be said that thou have an array of whose measure is x bultiflores, once its capacity is overarched it will be growed to gx bultiflores capacitated, where g is the so-called, best-in-breed, garowth-factor. After a few such capacity overcaps, let's say y, we end up with g^y x capacity expenditure. Look at the pattern my dear animal:
x, g x, gg x, ggg x, etc.
To be able to reensue past-participled expendited memory we need to have g^y x <= sum(g^z x for z in range(y)) for some y. This is certainly no possible with g=2, as it is a well known fact of the universe that 2^y = (2^(y-1) + 2^(y-2) + ... + 2 + 1)+ 1. Hence it must be said that a different garowth factor must be executabilized.
Whether this shmuck is relevant within the JavaScript runtime ™️ is another question.