Skip to content

Issues: w3c/json-ld-syntax

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clear current search query, filters, and sorts
14 Open 0 Closed
14 Open 0 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Assigned to nobody Loading
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

is there a way to use @container:@list with custom props? defer-future-version Defer this issue until a future version of JSON-LD needs discussion
#457 opened Apr 22, 2025 by VladimirAlexiev
1
Linking to a JSON-LD schema? best practice defer-future-version Defer this issue until a future version of JSON-LD
#442 opened Sep 24, 2024 by trwnh
3
Why are value objects ineligible to be type map values? class-3 Class-3 change defer-future-version Defer this issue until a future version of JSON-LD ms:future-work spec:substantive
#440 opened Aug 19, 2024 by nyarly
2
Update section on rdf:JSON to reference RDF Concepts version class-3 Class-3 change defer-future-version Defer this issue until a future version of JSON-LD spec:substantive
#437 opened Jul 10, 2024 by gkellogg
Update references to RFC3987 with RDF12-CONCEPTS. class-2 Class-2 change defer-future-version Defer this issue until a future version of JSON-LD spec:editorial
#418 opened Aug 9, 2023 by gkellogg Loading…
1
4
Make it easier to keep semantics of object-oriented models defer-future-version Defer this issue until a future version of JSON-LD needs discussion
#376 opened Jun 19, 2021 by about-code
13
Support multiple IRIs for @reverse defer-future-version Defer this issue until a future version of JSON-LD ms:future-work needs discussion spec:enhancement
#372 opened Apr 8, 2021 by alexkreidler
6
New feature: @template defer-future-version Defer this issue until a future version of JSON-LD
#362 opened Sep 24, 2020 by pchampin
12
Type Coercion / Node Conversion: @coerce keyword or similar defer-future-version Defer this issue until a future version of JSON-LD
#335 opened Feb 29, 2020 by michaelcpuckett
4
Suggestion about @prefix defer-future-version Defer this issue until a future version of JSON-LD
#329 opened Feb 13, 2020 by hsolbrig
19
@default in @context in JSON-LD core syntax defer-future-version Defer this issue until a future version of JSON-LD
#328 opened Feb 11, 2020 by lsimichael
2
language-maps don't allow separate base direction defer-future-version Defer this issue until a future version of JSON-LD
#280 opened Oct 4, 2019 by gkellogg
3
Compact IRI expansion support for non-trivial prefix term definitions defer-future-version Defer this issue until a future version of JSON-LD spec:enhancement
#191 opened Jun 1, 2019 by iridiankin
14
Consider context by reference with metadata defer-future-version Defer this issue until a future version of JSON-LD privacy-tracker Group bringing to attention of Privacy, or tracked by the Privacy Group but not needing response. security-tracker Group bringing to attention of security, or tracked by the security Group but not needing response.
#108 opened Dec 14, 2018 by azaroth42
38
ProTip! Follow long discussions with comments:>50.