You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This change improves the following use cases with
`WebRequest.checkNotModified(String etag)` and
`WebRequest.checkNotModified(long lastModifiedTimeStamp)`:
1) Allow weak comparisons for ETags
Per rfc7232 section-2.3, ETags can be strong or weak;
this change allows comparing weak forms `W/"etagvalue"` but does
not make a difference between strong and weak comparisons.
2) Allow multiple ETags in client requests
HTTP clients can send multiple ETags values in a single header such as:
`If-None-Match: "firstvalue", "secondvalue"`
This change makes sure each value is compared to the one provided by
the application side.
3) Extended support for ETag values
This change adds padding `"` to the ETag value provided by
the application, if not already done:
`etagvalue` => `"etagvalue"`
It also supports wildcard values `*` that can be sent by HTTP clients.
4) Sending validation headers for 304 responses
As defined in https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7232#section-4.1
`304 Not Modified` reponses must generate `Etag` and `Last-Modified`
HTTP headers, as they would have for a `200 OK` response.
5) Providing a new method to validate both Etag & Last-Modified
Also, this change adds a new method
`WebRequest.checkNotModified(String etag, long lastModifiedTimeStamp)`
in order to support validation of both `If-None-Match` and
`Last-Modified` headers sent by HTTP clients, if both values are
supported by the application code.
Even though this approach is recommended by the HTTP rfc (setting both
Etag and Last-Modified headers in the response), this requires more
application logic and may not apply to all resources produced by the
application.
Issue: SPR-11324
0 commit comments