Bonus test: builder pattern

This shows that the builder pattern can be expressed
with implicit function types.

Author: odersky

tests/run/builder.check

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+Table(Row(Cell(A1), Cell(B1)), Row(Cell(A2), Cell(B2)))

tests/run/builder.scala

@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+import collection.mutable.ArrayBuffer
+
+class Table {
+  val rows = new ArrayBuffer[Row]
+  def add(r: Row): Unit = rows += r
+  override def toString = rows.mkString("Table(", ", ", ")")
+}
+
+class Row {
+  val cells = new ArrayBuffer[Cell]
+  def add(c: Cell): Unit = cells += c
+  override def toString = cells.mkString("Row(", ", ", ")")
+}
+
+class Cell(elem: String) {
+  override def toString = s"Cell($elem)"
+}
+
+object Test {
+
+  def table(init: implicit Table => Unit) = {
+    implicit val t = new Table
+    init
+    t
+  }
+
+  def row(init: implicit Row => Unit)(implicit t: Table) = {
+    implicit val r = new Row
+    init
+    t.add(r)
+  }
+
+  def cell(str: String)(implicit r: Row) =
+    r.add(new Cell(str))
+
+  val data =
+    table {
+      row {
+        cell("A1")
+        cell("B1")
+      }
+      row {
+        cell("A2")
+        cell("B2")
+      }
+    }
+
+  def main(args: Array[String]) = {
+    println(data)
+  }
+}