From 1c2549eccaba782aba903ec984a67e80f4d32a2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Seth Tisue Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 07:09:37 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] SIP minutes: tweak wording about infix --- _sips/minutes/2020-03-11-minutes.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/_sips/minutes/2020-03-11-minutes.md b/_sips/minutes/2020-03-11-minutes.md index 6574fe86ba..0228bf43e4 100644 --- a/_sips/minutes/2020-03-11-minutes.md +++ b/_sips/minutes/2020-03-11-minutes.md @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ Most believe it to be useful, but multiple committee members vocally opposed mak Also can it be merged with `@jsName`? Seb: Yes, but Scala.js's symbol variant of that would have to remain separate. Seth et al considered that sufficient unification. -`@infix` is uncontroversial, but there is a question of whether to allow non-`@infix`-annotated methods to still be used infix before a curly brace, e.g. `xs map { ....`. +No one in the committee who has registered an opinion is against `@infix`, but there is a question of whether to allow non-`@infix`-annotated methods to still be used infix before a curly brace, e.g. `xs map { ....`. Conclusion: allow that in 3.0, maybe crack down harder later.