Add #![allow(..)] as necessary to get re-migrated run-pass tests compiling with clean stderr again.

Most were added mechanically.

Author: pnkfelix

src/test/run-pass/array-slice-vec/array_const_index-1.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(dead_code)]
 #![allow(stable_features)]
 
 #![feature(const_indexing)]

src/test/run-pass/array-slice-vec/check-static-mut-slices.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(dead_code)]
 
 // Checks that mutable static items can have mutable slices
 

src/test/run-pass/array-slice-vec/evec-slice.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(unused_assignments)]
 
 pub fn main() {
     let x : &[isize] = &[1,2,3,4,5];

src/test/run-pass/array-slice-vec/slice.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(unused_variables)]
 
 // Test slicing sugar.
 

src/test/run-pass/array-slice-vec/vec-late-init.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(unused_mut)]
 
 
 pub fn main() {

src/test/run-pass/array-slice-vec/vec-macro-with-brackets.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(unused_variables)]
 
 // pretty-expanded FIXME #23616
 

src/test/run-pass/array-slice-vec/vec-matching-legal-tail-element-borrow.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(unused_variables)]
 
 #![feature(slice_patterns)]
 

src/test/run-pass/associated-consts/associated-const-range-match-patterns.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(dead_code)]
 
 struct Foo;
 

src/test/run-pass/associated-types/associated-types-cc.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(unused_variables)]
 // aux-build:associated-types-cc-lib.rs
 
 // Test that we are able to reference cross-crate traits that employ

src/test/run-pass/associated-types/associated-types-duplicate-binding-in-env-hrtb.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(dead_code)]
 // Check that we do not report ambiguities when equivalent predicates
 // (modulo bound lifetime names) appears in the environment
 // twice. Issue #21965.

src/test/run-pass/associated-types/associated-types-duplicate-binding-in-env.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(dead_code)]
 // Check that we do not report ambiguities when the same predicate
 // appears in the environment twice. Issue #21965.
 

src/test/run-pass/associated-types/associated-types-impl-redirect.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,9 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(dead_code)]
+#![allow(unused_mut)]
+#![allow(unused_imports)]
 // Test how resolving a projection interacts with inference.  In this
 // case, we were eagerly unifying the type variable for the iterator
 // type with `I` from the where clause, ignoring the in-scope `impl`

src/test/run-pass/associated-types/associated-types-issue-21212.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(unused_variables)]
 // Regression test for #21212: an overflow occurred during trait
 // checking where normalizing `Self::Input` led to normalizing the
 // where clauses in the environment which in turn required normalizing

src/test/run-pass/associated-types/associated-types-nested-projections.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(unused_variables)]
 // Test that we can resolve nested projection types. Issue #20666.
 
 // pretty-expanded FIXME #23616

src/test/run-pass/associated-types/associated-types-normalize-in-bounds-binding.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(unused_variables)]
 // Test that we normalize associated types that appear in a bound that
 // contains a binding. Issue #21664.
 

src/test/run-pass/associated-types/associated-types-normalize-in-bounds-ufcs.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(unused_variables)]
 // Test that we normalize associated types that appear in bounds; if
 // we didn't, the call to `self.split2()` fails to type check.
 

src/test/run-pass/associated-types/associated-types-normalize-in-bounds.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(unused_variables)]
 // Test that we normalize associated types that appear in bounds; if
 // we didn't, the call to `self.split2()` fails to type check.
 

src/test/run-pass/associated-types/associated-types-projection-bound-in-supertraits.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(unused_variables)]
 // Test that we correctly handle projection bounds appearing in the
 // supertrait list (and in conjunction with overloaded operators). In
 // this case, the `Result=Self` binding in the supertrait listing of

src/test/run-pass/associated-types/associated-types-projection-in-object-type.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(dead_code)]
+#![allow(unused_imports)]
 // Corrected regression test for #20831. The original did not compile.
 // When fixed, it revealed another problem concerning projections that
 // appear in associated type bindings in object types, which were not

src/test/run-pass/associated-types/associated-types-projection-in-supertrait.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(dead_code)]
 // Test that we are handle to correctly handle a projection type
 // that appears in a supertrait bound. Issue #20559.
 

src/test/run-pass/associated-types/associated-types-projection-in-where-clause.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(dead_code)]
+#![allow(unused_variables)]
 // Test a where clause that uses a non-normalized projection type.
 
 // pretty-expanded FIXME #23616

src/test/run-pass/associated-types/associated-types-region-erasure-issue-20582.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(dead_code)]
 // Regression test for #20582. This test caused an ICE related to
 // inconsistent region erasure in codegen.
 

src/test/run-pass/associated-types/associated-types-sugar-path.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,9 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(dead_code)]
+#![allow(unused_variables)]
+#![allow(unused_imports)]
 // Test paths to associated types using the type-parameter-only sugar.
 
 use std::ops::Deref;

src/test/run-pass/associated-types/associated-types-where-clause-impl-ambiguity.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(dead_code)]
+#![allow(unused_imports)]
 // Test how resolving a projection interacts with inference.  In this
 // case, we were eagerly unifying the type variable for the iterator
 // type with `I` from the where clause, ignoring the in-scope `impl`

src/test/run-pass/autoref-autoderef/autoderef-and-borrow-method-receiver.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(dead_code)]
 // pretty-expanded FIXME #23616
 
 struct Foo {

src/test/run-pass/binding/bind-field-short-with-modifiers.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(unused_assignments)]
+#![allow(unused_variables)]
 #![allow(non_shorthand_field_patterns)]
 
 pub fn main() {

src/test/run-pass/binding/fat-arrow-match.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(dead_code)]
 #![allow(non_camel_case_types)]
 
 enum color {

src/test/run-pass/binding/func-arg-incomplete-pattern.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(dead_code)]
 // Test that we do not leak when the arg pattern must drop part of the
 // argument (in this case, the `y` field).
 

src/test/run-pass/binding/if-let.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(dead_code)]
 
 pub fn main() {
     let x = Some(3);

src/test/run-pass/binding/inconsistent-lifetime-mismatch.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(dead_code)]
 // pretty-expanded FIXME #23616
 
 fn foo(_: &[&str]) {}

src/test/run-pass/binding/match-arm-statics.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(dead_code)]
 // compile-flags: -g
 
 #[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]

src/test/run-pass/binding/match-bot-2.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(unreachable_code)]
 // n.b. This was only ever failing with optimization disabled.
 
 fn a() -> isize { match return 1 { 2 => 3, _ => panic!() } }

src/test/run-pass/binding/match-enum-struct-0.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(dead_code)]
 // regression test for issue #5625
 
 

src/test/run-pass/binding/match-enum-struct-1.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(dead_code)]
 
 enum E {
     Foo{f : isize},

src/test/run-pass/binding/match-join.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(unused_mut)]
 fn foo<T>(y: Option<T>) {
     let mut x: isize;
     let mut rs: Vec<isize> = Vec::new();

src/test/run-pass/binding/match-naked-record.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(dead_code)]
 // pretty-expanded FIXME #23616
 
 struct X { x: isize }

src/test/run-pass/binding/match-path.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(dead_code)]
 #![allow(non_camel_case_types)]
 
 

src/test/run-pass/binding/match-pattern-no-type-params.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(dead_code)]
 #![allow(non_camel_case_types)]
 
 enum maybe<T> { nothing, just(T), }

src/test/run-pass/binding/match-pattern-simple.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(dead_code)]
 
 
 // pretty-expanded FIXME #23616

src/test/run-pass/binding/match-phi.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(dead_code)]
+#![allow(unused_assignments)]
 // pretty-expanded FIXME #23616
 #![allow(non_camel_case_types)]
 #![allow(unused_variables)]

src/test/run-pass/binding/match-str.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(dead_code)]
 // Issue #53
 #![allow(non_camel_case_types)]
 

src/test/run-pass/binding/match-tag.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(unused_mut)]
 #![allow(non_camel_case_types)]
 
 

src/test/run-pass/binding/mut-in-ident-patterns.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(dead_code)]
+#![allow(unused_assignments)]
 #![allow(non_camel_case_types)]
 #![allow(non_shorthand_field_patterns)]
 

src/test/run-pass/binding/nested-exhaustive-match.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(dead_code)]
 // pretty-expanded FIXME #23616
 
 struct Foo { foo: bool, bar: Option<isize>, baz: isize }

src/test/run-pass/binding/nested-pattern.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(dead_code)]
 #![allow(non_camel_case_types)]
 
 // a bug was causing this to complain about leaked memory on exit

src/test/run-pass/binding/optional_comma_in_match_arm.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(unused_unsafe)]
 // ignore-pretty issue #37199
 #![allow(while_true)]
 

src/test/run-pass/binding/use-uninit-match.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(dead_code)]
 #![allow(non_camel_case_types)]
 
 

src/test/run-pass/binding/use-uninit-match2.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
 // except according to those terms.
 
 // run-pass
+#![allow(dead_code)]
+#![allow(unused_mut)]
 #![allow(non_camel_case_types)]