Skip to content

Commit ca352df

Browse files
committed
Add Governance WG CFP
1 parent 7194cd0 commit ca352df

File tree

1 file changed

+64
-0
lines changed

1 file changed

+64
-0
lines changed
Lines changed: 64 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
1+
# Governance WG Call For Participation
2+
3+
Hello everyone, the governance working group has been working a few efforts, but
4+
we haven't made as much progress as we would have liked over the past few
5+
months, so we are going to try out a new process and meeting agenda aimed at
6+
trying to get more work done in the time we know we have.
7+
8+
## New Meeting Structure
9+
10+
Previously we have been doing most of our work async while using our bi-weekly
11+
meeting call to triage tasks. The problem we ran into with this is that a lot of
12+
the members also heavy contributors to the Rust project as a whole, and it can
13+
be can hard for some people to schedule time write an initial draft.
14+
15+
To address this instead of triaging during the meeting and working on tasks in
16+
async, we're going to focused topic based meetings, and use the time between
17+
meetings, to publish posts like this and to research and prepare for the next
18+
topic. To help do this we're going to extend our current meeting duration from
19+
30 minutes to an hour. (The meeting will still be every two weeks.)
20+
21+
The current goals are to documenting the de-facto governance structure, provide
22+
the result as a RFC and then if merged provide a version on
23+
<forge.rust-lang.org> so that it has greater visbility. We also want to try
24+
schedule people involved in Rust and other governance structures to come and
25+
talk about their experiences.
26+
27+
For deciding what topics, we're going to have rotating person for each meeting
28+
who takes the lead for the next meeting. It's that person's responsibility to
29+
decide the topic and to prepare a blog post similar to this informing people of
30+
the topic and how they might best prepare.
31+
32+
We also hope that having a focused topic will reduce any barrier of expected
33+
knowledge in order to participate and contribute. With that said let's talk
34+
about the topic for next meeting.
35+
36+
## Reviewing & Examining Previous Governance RFCs
37+
38+
Our first topic for new meeting is going to be to read [RFC 1068] aka the
39+
original Rust Governance RFC, review how accurate it is to today's structure,
40+
and see any if there are questions that we have that it doesn't answer. There's
41+
also some other RFCs that are also good to read that are listed below.
42+
43+
- ["North Star" RFC] from 2016 that layouts the Rust roadmap process.
44+
- [Compiler contributors RFC] details the process of contributing to the
45+
compiler and progression towards joining the compiler team.
46+
- [Compiler bug fix procedure] defines the best practices for making a bug fix
47+
to the compiler.
48+
49+
Our next meeting is going to be at **22:00 on Tuesday, November 19th** and we'd
50+
like to encourage anyone who's interested, regardless of their previous
51+
experience to read those RFCs and come to the `#wg-governance` channel on
52+
discord to attend the meeting. (Our meetings are done over a video call with
53+
Zoom, but we use the discord channel to organise ourselves).
54+
55+
If some reason you know you won't be able to attend these meetings but would
56+
still like to participate. We're encouraging for people to post any questions
57+
they have about Rust's governance they have as [issues on our
58+
GitHub repository][gh-issues].
59+
60+
[rfc 1068]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/1068-rust-governance.html
61+
["north star" rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/26197104b7bb9a5a35db243d639aee6e46d35d75/text/1728-north-star.md
62+
[compiler contributors rfc]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2689-compiler-team-contributors.html
63+
[compiler bug fix procedure]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/1589-rustc-bug-fix-procedure.html
64+
[gh-issues]: https://github.com/rust-lang/wg-governance/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3AQuestion

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)