We should probably remove idom.run()

[Archmonger]

Or at the very least, move it into a subfolder that makes it clear that it is a development utility. It shouldn't be the primary advertised way of using IDOM.

Using a development webserver for production use is a big no-no, and by prominently displaying idom.run() as the first steps to using IDOM shows we are encouraging people to do just that. I believe the primary way of utilizing IDOM should be embedding within existing applications (see #653).

---

If we really want a run() callable to exist as a shortcut for running a simple single component application, we can consider is bundling a cross-platform ASGI webserver within this project and have idom.run() utilize that instead of running a development webserver. Hypercorn and Daphne are the only ASGI webserver I've tested be fully cross platform with no issues.

But even in this scenario I would still recommend changing the callable path to something like idom.shortcuts.run().

[rmorshea]

Good point. Sanic (the default) runs with a production server but the others don't.