Should we rename this repository/package? #645
Replies: 4 comments 10 replies
-
+1 to a name change! I'm not super involved in the project, but I do agree that a different name that implies the reactive nature of this project will help. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
We'll also need new branding. A first pass logo could be the react atom except the loops around the atomic core are one or more snakes. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Do you plan to keep the dependency on ReactJS? I am asking because it would be very convenient if we could load other JS frameworks like Alpine.js. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
So there's a couple of reasons to consider a rename.
IDOM
does without first knowing what a Documented Oriented Model is, so they might not click on the project. But, IDOM's usage is simple enough to where the user doesn't actually need to understand what a DOM is.Here's a couple potential names that could increase name clarity.
I personally believe having React in the name makes sense for us, since we heavily rely on the ReactJS Client to do anything in the front-end.
Comment below if you have other naming ideas, have a personal favorite name, or if you agree/disagree with this.
If we perform a name change, this should be done sooner rather than later. The longer a package exists, the more difficult a name change becomes.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions