From 1191a5a326dce5d83ccd56ec4a1ad73571dedc6a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "sangjune.park" <sangjune.park@navercorp.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 16:12:51 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] add : torchserve version required for multi-worker

---
 intermediate_source/torchserve_with_ipex.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/intermediate_source/torchserve_with_ipex.rst b/intermediate_source/torchserve_with_ipex.rst
index caef6926763..fbf705a7c47 100644
--- a/intermediate_source/torchserve_with_ipex.rst
+++ b/intermediate_source/torchserve_with_ipex.rst
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ We'll compare the following three configurations:
 
 (2) `torch.set_num_threads <https://pytorch.org/docs/stable/generated/torch.set_num_threads.html>`_ = ``number of physical cores / number of workers`` (no core pinning)
 
-(3) core pinning via the launch script 
+(3) core pinning via the launch script (Required Torchserve>=0.6.1)
 
 After this exercise, we'll have verified that we prefer avoiding logical cores and prefer local memory access via core pinning with a real TorchServe use case.