From 0c967294f94bbfcda65f0fc6e4a4cbb23fbbfa48 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Jakub=20Raczy=C5=84ski?= <jakub.raczynski@altalog.pl>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 11:25:46 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] DOC: Fix sparse and dense array memory usage comparison.

---
 doc/source/user_guide/sparse.rst | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/source/user_guide/sparse.rst b/doc/source/user_guide/sparse.rst
index 25bcb8bcc0c93..624086f7a8505 100644
--- a/doc/source/user_guide/sparse.rst
+++ b/doc/source/user_guide/sparse.rst
@@ -40,8 +40,8 @@ and in the Python interpreter.
 
 .. ipython:: python
 
-   'dense : {:0.2f} bytes'.format(df.memory_usage().sum() / 1e3)
-   'sparse: {:0.2f} bytes'.format(sdf.memory_usage().sum() / 1e3)
+   f'dense: {df.memory_usage().sum()} bytes'
+   f'sparse: {sdf.memory_usage().sum()} bytes'
 
 Functionally, their behavior should be nearly
 identical to their dense counterparts.