From 6a909e981b09142d68e848f93ad4e49a0daaac8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Laprun <claprun@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 16:47:35 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] fix: improper use of @link

Signed-off-by: Chris Laprun <claprun@redhat.com>
---
 .../operator/api/reconciler/dependent/DependentResource.java    | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/operator-framework-core/src/main/java/io/javaoperatorsdk/operator/api/reconciler/dependent/DependentResource.java b/operator-framework-core/src/main/java/io/javaoperatorsdk/operator/api/reconciler/dependent/DependentResource.java
index 375afd4397..7c4e530ce2 100644
--- a/operator-framework-core/src/main/java/io/javaoperatorsdk/operator/api/reconciler/dependent/DependentResource.java
+++ b/operator-framework-core/src/main/java/io/javaoperatorsdk/operator/api/reconciler/dependent/DependentResource.java
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ default Optional<R> getSecondaryResource(P primary, Context<P> context) {
    * Determines whether resources associated with this dependent need explicit handling when
    * deleted, usually meaning that the dependent implements {@link Deleter}
    *
-   * @return {@code true} if explicit handling of resource deletion is needed, {@link false}
+   * @return {@code true} if explicit handling of resource deletion is needed, {@code false}
    *         otherwise
    */
   default boolean isDeletable() {