Turbogears is not worth a mention

Author: nedbat

doc/cmd.rst

@@ -124,8 +124,7 @@ code as well as your own, add the ``-L`` (or ``--pylib``) flag.
 
 If your coverage results seem to be overlooking code that you know has been
 executed, try running coverage.py again with the ``--timid`` flag.  This uses a
-simpler but slower trace method.  Projects that use DecoratorTools, including
-TurboGears, will need to use ``--timid`` to get correct results.
+simpler but slower trace method, and might be needed in rare cases.
 
 If you are measuring coverage in a multi-process program, or across a number of
 machines, you'll want the ``--parallel-mode`` switch to keep the data separate

doc/trouble.rst

@@ -53,21 +53,6 @@ coverage.py from working properly:
 .. _issue 43: https://bitbucket.org/ned/coveragepy/issues/43/coverage-measurement-fails-on-code
 
 
-Things that require --timid
----------------------------
-
-Some packages interfere with coverage measurement, but you might be able to
-make it work by using the ``--timid`` command-line switch, or the ``[run]
-timid=True`` configuration option.
-
-* `DecoratorTools`_, or any package which uses it, notably `TurboGears`_.
-  DecoratorTools fiddles with the trace function.  You  will need to use
-  ``--timid``.
-
-.. _DecoratorTools: https://pypi.org/project/DecoratorTools/
-.. _TurboGears: http://turbogears.org/
-
-
 Still having trouble?
 ---------------------