Skip to content

Commit 2744889

Browse files
committed
MQE-1796: Magento Git vs Composer and MFTF
Fixed review comments.
1 parent 49d318e commit 2744889

File tree

1 file changed

+2
-2
lines changed

1 file changed

+2
-2
lines changed

docs/guides/git-vs-composer-install.md

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ If you are developing your own module or adding MFTF tests to the module, you sh
3939
If you want to distribute the module and its tests, you can initialize a git repo and create a [composer package](https://devdocs.magento.com/guides/v2.3/extension-dev-guide/package/package_module.html). In this way others will be able to download and install your module and access your tests as a composer package, in their `<vendor>` folder.
4040

4141

42-
### MFTF test artifacts location
42+
### MFTF test materials location
4343

4444
- For GitHub installation, MFTF test materials are located at `<magento_root>/app/code/<vendor_name>/<module_name>/Test/Mftf/`. This is the directory to create new tests or maintain existing ones.
4545

@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ In either of the installations, all tests and test data are read and merged by M
7474

7575
### Conclusion
7676

77-
There are no differences from MFTF's perspective between having the test materials in `app/code` or in `/vendor` as it reads artifacts from both paths. It works the same. Composer based install may benefit teams when there's a need to match file systems in dev and production.
77+
There are no differences from MFTF's perspective between having the test materials in `app/code` or in `/vendor`. It works the same. Composer based install may benefit teams when there's a need to match file systems in dev and production.
7878

7979
If you are a contributing developer with an understanding of Git and Composer commands, you can choose the GitHub installation method instead.
8080

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)