You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Summary:
C++11 onwards specs the non-member functions atomic_load and atomic_load_explicit as taking the atomic<T> by const (potentially volatile) pointer. C11, in its infinite wisdom, decided to drop the const, and C17 will fix this with DR459 (the current draft forgot to fix B.16, but that’s not the normative part).
clang’s lib/Headers/stdatomic.h implements these as #define to the __c11_* equivalent, which are builtins with custom typecheck. Fix the typecheck.
D47613 takes care of the libc++ side.
Discussion: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2018-May/058129.html
<rdar://problem/27426936>
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47618
llvm-svn: 338743
__c11_atomic_load(ci, memory_order_seq_cst);// expected-error {{address argument to atomic operation must be a pointer to non-const _Atomic type ('const _Atomic(int) *' invalid)}}
__c11_atomic_init(ci, 0); // expected-error {{address argument to atomic operation must be a pointer to non-const _Atomic type ('const _Atomic(int) *' invalid)}}
224
224
__c11_atomic_store(ci, 0, memory_order_release); // expected-error {{address argument to atomic operation must be a pointer to non-const _Atomic type ('const _Atomic(int) *' invalid)}}
225
-
__c11_atomic_load(ci, memory_order_acquire);// expected-error {{address argument to atomic operation must be a pointer to non-const _Atomic type ('const _Atomic(int) *' invalid)}}
225
+
__c11_atomic_load(ci, memory_order_acquire);
226
226
227
227
// Ensure the <stdatomic.h> macros behave appropriately.
__opencl_atomic_load(ci, memory_order_seq_cst, memory_scope_work_group); // expected-error {{address argument to atomic operation must be a pointer to non-const _Atomic type ('const __generic atomic_int *' (aka 'const __generic _Atomic(int) *') invalid)}}
__opencl_atomic_load(i_c, memory_order_seq_cst, memory_scope_work_group); // expected-error {{address argument to atomic operation must be a pointer to non-constant _Atomic type ('__constant atomic_int *' (aka '__constant _Atomic(int) *') invalid)}}
__opencl_atomic_init(ci, 0); // expected-error {{address argument to atomic operation must be a pointer to non-const _Atomic type ('const __generic atomic_int *' (aka 'const __generic _Atomic(int) *') invalid)}}
96
97
__opencl_atomic_store(ci, 0, memory_order_release, memory_scope_work_group); // expected-error {{address argument to atomic operation must be a pointer to non-const _Atomic type ('const __generic atomic_int *' (aka 'const __generic _Atomic(int) *') invalid)}}
97
-
__opencl_atomic_load(ci, memory_order_acquire, memory_scope_work_group);// expected-error {{address argument to atomic operation must be a pointer to non-const _Atomic type ('const __generic atomic_int *' (aka 'const __generic _Atomic(int) *') invalid)}}
__opencl_atomic_init(&gn, (void*)0); // expected-warning{{incompatible pointer to integer conversion passing '__generic void *' to parameter of type 'int'}}
0 commit comments