Skip to content

Commit 6673b57

Browse files
authored
Implemented Bob's comment
Also moved Context about Problem
1 parent 15e49c7 commit 6673b57

File tree

1 file changed

+7
-3
lines changed

1 file changed

+7
-3
lines changed

dont-bother-looking.md

Lines changed: 7 additions & 3 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,15 +1,17 @@
11
## Title
22
* Don't bother looking
3-
* Not looking for stuff internally
43

5-
## Problem
6-
People don't bother looking for internally developed solutions - they might not find the repo at all or be aware of its existence.
4+
## Also Known As
5+
* Not looking for stuff internally
76

87
## Context
98
* Software component(s) are available internally but users can't easily find these.
109
* This problem is more likely to occur where there are silos in the company (e.g., larger companies; smaller companies may have fewer opportunities for reuse of internally developed software).
1110
* The company traditionally has been bad at sharing across silos (people don't have the culture of sharing).
1211

12+
## Problem
13+
People don't bother looking for internally developed solutions - they might not find the repo at all or be aware of its existence.
14+
1315
## Forces
1416
* No good internal search engine (or not connected to git repositories; and difficult to make this change happen)
1517
* Users may not know there are common places to find internally developed solutions.
@@ -21,6 +23,8 @@ People don't bother looking for internally developed solutions - they might not
2123
- if someone put out a SW internally, the expectation is that they wouldn't have time to support it (vs. open source options)
2224

2325
## Solution
26+
Make it easy to find the reusable code.
27+
2428
* Pull in Repo names, descriptions and README.md files into the search engine
2529
* Implement process change to first check for internal solutions for this problem
2630
* Tool with a central view (but people are more inclined to google externally than look internally)

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)